• English

Mineral Filled Polyolefins

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

With Polyolefins, the circumstance is not the same as PVC. Here Fillers like Talc and Calcium carbonate are added to enhance firmness to PP, or wanted properties like antifibrilation in HDPE or PP Rafia Tape. Consolidation of Fillers in Polyolefins is a costly procedure as clarified above, Further, not at all like PVC which is polar, Polyolefins are non polar, requiring more vitality to embody the polar fillers Compounding costs for filling Polyolefins can be as high as Rs 10-15/kg., (US$220-330/MT) with the lower figure more predominant when financial matters of scale with high limit exacerbating types of gear are overwhelming.

Filled Polyolefins (10-40%) are costlier per kg. then the base polymer since aggravating expenses exceed the lower filler cost. The volume costs run up pointedly with thickness increment, however, necessities of better firmness in Auto Components, Molded Furniture and other specialized parts is the main thrust for filler expansion. It is just at filler levels of more than 40%, as in filler masterbatches, that the cost per kilo plunges beneath Polymer cost levels, however the volume cost will at present be antagonistic. Consequently, regularly filler expansion does not naturally prompt cost reserve funds with Polyolefins as it does with PVC.

Another essential contrast is that Fillers are stacked in PVC in Parts per Hundred Resin (PHR). In Polyolefins, Filler stacking is communicated as a level of the aggregate compound weight. When some person communicates shock that his rival is utilizing 100% filler in his PVC Pipes, clearly you can’t expel pipes out of 100% CaCO3!! What he implies is 100 sections PVC Resin, 100 sections Filler in addition to the standard Stabilizers, Lubricants and color. Along these lines the real filler Percentage would be 100/210 (say)= 48%. This isn’t an abnormal stacking, at any rate in Polyolefins with Filler masterbatches surpassing these levels. I make this qualification in light of the fact that alluding to PHR in PVC mixes as % is a typical error.

Mineral Fillers utilized as a part of Polyolefins:

Numerous mineral fillers have been attempted, however the most widely recognized are Talc and CaCO3. I am excluding Glass Fibers and other colorful fillers like Carbon Fibers or Nano Clays which are costlier than the polymer and are execution supporters.

Calcium Carbonate: Probably the least expensive Mineral Filler, it is utilized by the Plastic business in two structures:

  • Ground Calcium Carbonate (GCC)- The mined CaCO3 is pummeled and characterized into various molecule sizes. Immaculateness is particularly dependant on the Limestone source. Marble gives the purest GCC however is costlier. In India costs extend from as low as ` 3/kg. what’s more, can go up to Rs 12.50/kg. (US$80-250/MT). GCC can likewise be covered by stearates and different added substances which diminishes surface strain between polymer dissolve and Filler molecule, making homogenization less demanding. These are costlier, with a portion of the claim to fame grades from International organizations like Omya andSolvay going upto Rs 22.50-27/kg. (US$500-600/MT.)
  • Precipitated Calcium Carbonate (PCC) – Calcium oxide is set up by calcining the mined calcium carbonate. Water is added to give calcium hydroxide (drain of lime). Insolubles can be isolated and the drain of lime carbonated with the CO2 acquired amid calcinations. The carbon dioxide accelerates the coveted calcium carbonate from the drain of lime, is separated, dried and pummeled. PCC is purer and less rough to handling hardware yet costlier than GCC of identical molecule estimate. Uncoated PCC costs go from Rs 9 � 13.50/kg. (US$250-300/MT) while Coated PCC would be about Re 1/kg more.

A PCC review of about Rs 10/kg was utilized for the past estimations. These days adequate GCC grades are accessible and numerous compounders have changed over to it. For the present exercise a GCC of Rs 8/kg is utilized

Give us a chance to have a more critical take a gander at CaCO3 filled PP and HDPE.

Mineral Filled PPCo and HDPE Applications

– The high volume Filled PP applications are:

  • Automotive Bumpers, Dashboards, and Components
  • Talc is the principle filler, upheld with littler amounts of Calcium Carbonate. Good rubbers are regularly added to support affect quality.

– Molded Furniture

  • Precipitated or Ground Calcium Carbonate is the principle filler.

– Raffia Tape

  • Precipitated or Ground Calcium Carbonate is the principle filler. Both PP Homopolymer and HDPE are blended with Filler masterbatches for the accommodation and money saving advantages.

– Low Cost Films

  • Talc is the favored filler as it has the slightest impact on translucency. GCC is additionally broadly utilized for transluscent films. Fillers have been attempted with PP, however exercises are more in the HDPE division as the movies are translucent/misty when contrasted with PP and LLDPE films.

– The method of reasoning for mineral filled PP and HDPE is more to improve physical properties instead of cost diminishment (with an imperative special case which we will talk about later).

– In PP, CaCO3, Talc, and other mineral fillers enhance firmness and enhance paintability.

– In HDPE and PP, CaCO3 is widely utilized as an antifibrillating specialist for Raffia Tapes.

– PP/LDPE/LLDPE are ordinarily not filled as straightforwardness and film blowing execution are gravely influenced.



Thank you for filling out our form. We will contact you shortly!
Register Now